Back to top

IP at the Supreme Court: TikTok v. Garland

January 10, 2025 | 5:00 - 6:00 pm EDT | Online

Link to Recording

Moderated by Professor Michael Carroll

American University Washington College of Law regularly invites counsel of record and counsel for selected amici to offer post-argument reflections in intellectual property (and related) cases heard by the Supreme Court. These events are held on the afternoon of oral argument before the Court. 

Issue

Whether the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act, as applied to petitioners, violates the First Amendment.

All briefs available on Scotusblog.com - TikTok v. Garland

Panelists

panelists

 

  • Peter Choharis, Choharis Law
    Amicus Curiae Brief of The Foundation for Defense of Democracies in Support of Respondent.

  • Ari Cohn — Foundation for Individual Rights & Expression (FIRE)
    Amicus Curiae Brief of Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression National Coalition Against Censorship, Institute for Justice, and Reason Foundation in Support of Applicants.

  • Kufere Laing - White & Case
    Amicus Curiae Brief of National Security Professors Aaronson, Edgar, and Klein in Support of Petitioner. 

  • Jonathan Patchen - Wilkie
    Amicus Curiae Brief of First Amendment and Internet Law Professors in Support of Petitioner.

  • Peter Torstensen, Jr., Deputy Solicitor General, State of Montana

    Amicus Curiae Brief of Montana, Virginia, and 20 Other States, in Support of Respondent.


Accommodation Request
If you would like to request a disability-related accommodation or accessibility information, please contact PIJIP at pijip@wcl.american.edu.